Pixie Trix Comix & Hiveworks Community

Nice Job, Starlor...Chloe...

Considering that locket is meant to keep its wearer under the control of the one who possesses its key (and the one baring the collar is incapable of refusing the demands given to them), what are the chances that - if UberTeds can actually be restrained by its power - Chloe uses Teddy's ill begotten omnipotent power to turn back time to the day Teddy made that pact with the added insistence that his past self not make the pact (or stay after hours to dick around with private property - for that matter - which is what caused the whole mess to begin with) - thus erasing everything that had transpired over the last few years (real time).

I.e. - Chloe forces a hard reboot in order to save everyone (including herself).

Fluffy wrote: ↑

Sat Feb 23, 2019 1:32 pm

Considering that locket is meant to keep its wearer under the control of the one who possesses its key (and the one baring the collar is incapable of refusing the demands given to them), what are the chances that - if UberTeds can actually be restrained by its power - Chloe uses Teddy's ill begotten omnipotent power to turn back time to the day Teddy made that pact with the added insistence that his past self not make the pact (or stay after hours to dick around with private property - for that matter - which is what caused the whole mess to begin with) - thus erasing everything that had transpired over the last few years (real time).

I.e. - Chloe forces a hard reboot in order to save everyone (including herself).

That would almost be a bigger letdown than eeriee cuties' 'ending'. (Almost)

Dragon Paladin wrote: ↑

Sat Feb 23, 2019 2:45 pm

That would almost be a bigger letdown than eeriee cuties' 'ending'. (Almost)

It would be bland; but it would also make for a tidy solution to all the problems that need fixing in this screwed up universe.

More likely Chloe would tell Teddy to go back i time and put it all right which he does (almost). The comic ends with Teddy telling Abby he's just going out - adding under his breath that he's got a date with a duck - and the whole universe is locked into an endlessly repeating cycle.

its sorta hilarious to thinnk a god creature was made.. all because.... of cursed panties.
way back when that spawned Chloe's growth faster than was originally intended for her biology/her mom's intentions.
Had those cursed panties not been a thing, then Chloe would've joined school a while later. and likely would have been more mature mentally, probably more evil, and more trained in powers in general.


sidenote on the starlord comment. (and well Inifnity war spoilers I guess)

honestly its Gamora and then Starlord, and then Starlord's fault.
Gamora knew she was the only one in the universe who could provide that stone.
Instead of hiding from him, like she had been doing. She instead decided to race for a stone. that they already stated he most likely would get there first. then instead of escaping she tried to kill. Starlord's fault is not conviencing her to run. or forcefully making her hide. and then the normal screw up folks talk about

Fluffy wrote: ↑

Sat Feb 23, 2019 1:32 pm

Considering that locket is meant to keep its wearer under the control of the one who possesses its key (and the one baring the collar is incapable of refusing the demands given to them), what are the chances that - if UberTeds can actually be restrained by its power - Chloe uses Teddy's ill begotten omnipotent power to turn back time to the day Teddy made that pact with the added insistence that his past self not make the pact (or stay after hours to dick around with private property - for that matter - which is what caused the whole mess to begin with) - thus erasing everything that had transpired over the last few years (real time).

I.e. - Chloe forces a hard reboot in order to save everyone (including herself).

Would that result in the mom still being around?

Zellgato wrote: ↑

Sat Feb 23, 2019 5:03 pm

its sorta hilarious to thinnk a god creature was made.. all because.... of cursed panties.
way back when that spawned Chloe's growth faster than was originally intended for her biology/her mom's intentions.

The panties didn't make Chloe a goddess. Adora explained that all it did was awaken her powers ahead of time.

Cortez wrote: ↑

Fri Feb 22, 2019 5:32 pm

Ilsa also wasn't exactly twisting Abby's arm to sign that contract

Because she's a child. There's a reason kids can't legally consent to a contract.

Indeed. Interesting how the Pheremones! / Consent! / Supernatual Rape! / Sex Ew! / Violence Yay! blowhards missed that one completely.

Gotoh wrote: ↑

Sat Feb 23, 2019 6:05 pm

The panties didn't make Chloe a goddess. Adora explained that all it did was awaken her powers ahead of time.

True, but the Doompanties arc wrap-up was where Adora & Chloe decided that it would be best if Chloe were enrolled in TA, which led to the launch of DC.

Absinthe Green wrote: ↑

Sat Feb 23, 2019 6:34 pm

Indeed. Interesting how the Pheremones! / Consent! / Supernatual Rape! / Sex Ew! / Violence Yay! blowhards missed that one completely.

No one's said "sex ew", unless it's potentially with a minor, or proper consent wasn't/couldn't be given. Sadly, the only two times anyone's handled consent responsibly was in MC and SotR.

As for the part about Abby's contract, I've said several times that the fault lies mainly with Chloe since she's the elder of the two, and because it was her idea to bring Abby to see Ilsa.

Gotoh wrote: ↑

Sat Feb 23, 2019 6:47 pm

...or proper consent wasn't/couldn't be given.

Which was only possible if one jettisoned DC's narrative context of sexualized pratfalling & confused How Pheromones Work &/ Don't Work IRL with the ad campaigns for Axe Body Spray. It would take less empty rhetorical posturing successfully arguing that Fuzzy-Wuzzy Fluffy-Bunny-Marshmallow Girl-Girl Porn is an accurate & honest representation of the day-in-day-out day-to-day lives of Old School Butch-Femme Bulldaggers than to equate DC's horndogged Rube-Goldberging &/ the general tone of Pixie Trix's eroticized slapstick with sexual assault-coercion. Some certainly tried, & their most noteable achievement was less the advancement of any progressive insights/understanding/enlightenment re the nature & impact of sexual violence & more the lasting impression that they can't see any distinction between Triumph Of The Will & Springtime For Hitler, not to mention demonstrating a rock-ribbed, ironclad & steel-shod willfully self-righteous tone-deafness on the subject to boot.

Gotoh wrote: ↑

Sat Feb 23, 2019 6:47 pm

As for the part about Abby's contract, I've said several times that the fault lies mainly with Chloe since she's the elder of the two, and because it was her idea to bring Abby to see Ilsa.

Which fits seamlessly into Dangerously Chloe's narrative trope of Well-Intentioned Goofballs Acting In Good Faith To Make Things Better Only To Wind Up Making Things Hilariously Worse.

Absinthe Green wrote: ↑

Sat Feb 23, 2019 8:09 pm

Gotoh wrote: ↑

Sat Feb 23, 2019 6:47 pm

...or proper consent wasn't/couldn't be given.

Which was only possible if one jettisoned DC's narrative context of sexualized pratfalling & confused How Pheromones Work &/ Don't Work IRL with the ad campaigns for Axe Body Spray

I find it more likely that people react and post according to their own sensibilities (i.e. according to what they do and don't find morally acceptable). Comedy and slapstick aren't exempt simply because. DC presents a lot of questionable situations, like a minor working in strip club, or the fact the fact that Teddy and Abby's dad is now a thrall, who was being raped every night by his new "wife".

There is no denying that either of things happened, because the comic clearly shows that they did. The same is true regarding the effect of Teddy's pheromones, and so on. The same is true in other works that depict acts of violence, or criminal activity. Just because they're works of fiction doesn't mean people aren't allowed to call a spade a "spade". Nor does it mean they're unable to distinguish fiction from reality. It simply means those individuals don't find it acceptable under either circumstance. Though many are willing to make exceptions now and then.

Absunthe Green wrote: ↑

Sat Feb 23, 2019 8:09 pm

Which fits seamlessly into Dangerously Chloe's narrative trope of Well-Intentioned Goofballs Acting In Good Faith To Make Things Better Only To Wind Up Making Things Hilariously Worse.

Eh, no. I'd asy that falls squarely under "stop helping me," due to Chloe's shortsightedness and her apparent lack of common sense, 'cuz no one in their right mind would've thought that was a good idea.

On the subject of how powerful Teddi's pheromones were here (again) are two trained monster hunters talking about them. They don't seem to be under any illusion about how they work or what they can do to humans and they were glad that they were far enough away that they only got a small dose http://www.dangerouslychloe.com/strips- ... Her_Thrall

Did... Chloe just... save the day? I was pinning my hopes on the contract itself, we never did find out what the price was(The little girl became a demon like she wanted and was allowed to keep her soul. But there must have been something... and that something could well be related to Teddi.), but if this works, I'll take it.

I do so hope this arrogant monster Teddi is/has been utterly defeated. She's the villain here(an impressive accomplishment frankly considering Cut-Thrust is right there). Not because of the nookie or the pheromones just so we're clear (you might as well blame Brooke and Layla for what was happening here), it's the way she's been behaving since Pandora returned with the angel blood (or shortly thereafter) that's despicable and ire-worthy. I mean, this is a school shooting in all but name. Yes, the school girls are succubae... but they were born succubae. They weren't cursed for rebelling or anything. Teddi's racist against demons.

... Teddy's suffered plenty at the hands of demons, yet only blew up at Chloe, a demon, after she got Abby in trouble. I don't think racism is in it.