Page 1 of 1

07SEP12 - Nothing to see here

Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 11:28 am
by Azrael
New Roomie


Move along. Nothing to see here. :p

Re: 07SEP12 - Nothing to see here

Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:05 pm
by Blissfull Wulf
I'm sorry, I got distracted, what did you say, Az?

Re: 07SEP12 - Nothing to see here

Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:45 pm
by Artemisia
Only Roomie would say 'nothing to see here'.

Re: 07SEP12 - Nothing to see here

Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 1:30 am
by MonCappy
I dunno what Chloe means there. It looks like there is plenty to see to me. :ymblushing:

Re: 07SEP12 - Nothing to see here

Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 8:54 pm
by ed_montague
Roomie is, according to Word of God, at least partially based on Chloe's wilder, younger life. Ramona closely resembles our talented artist. Both have evolved considerably from their origins, but nevertheless the similarity is there--plus, they were conceived and drawn by the same person.

That is one hell of an interesting situation that Lillian's just walked in on, and raises a philosophical question: If your characters have sex, is it considered incest or masturbation?

Re: 07SEP12 - Nothing to see here

Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 4:05 am
by Artemisia
masturcest? Insurbation?

Re: 07SEP12 - Nothing to see here

Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:17 am
by Jenny Creed
It's masturbation, but honestly no more so than any creative work. I think writing your characters having sex is a lot like being aware your children have sex. (Well, children who for some reason aren't related to each other.) It's just something you have to endure if you're going to permit them to live their own lives.

Though this raises the question, if I say panel 2 is particularly hot do I make Chloe uncomfortable? X_X